<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beware of port scanning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/</link>
	<description>Internet Security Tips and Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:13:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Juillerat</title>
		<link>http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Juillerat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 18:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/#comment-183</guid>
		<description>FTP in passive mode transmitting each block through another port: your solution getting around this problem ? With one provider, I had to switch to active mode, but it&#039;s not the recommended solution, therefore the question. Does it not look rather like port scanning ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FTP in passive mode transmitting each block through another port: your solution getting around this problem ? With one provider, I had to switch to active mode, but it&#8217;s not the recommended solution, therefore the question. Does it not look rather like port scanning ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nevi</title>
		<link>http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Nevi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Outpost is a good firewall,Online Armour probably even better.If you use firewalls of this caliber,coupled with a good updated antivirus,you are safe.But its probably just as important to make sure your whole computer is patched up all over.If there are holes,they will be used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outpost is a good firewall,Online Armour probably even better.If you use firewalls of this caliber,coupled with a good updated antivirus,you are safe.But its probably just as important to make sure your whole computer is patched up all over.If there are holes,they will be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin</title>
		<link>http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Outpost rocks, port scans blocked several times. Once was a chat session with a HP printer tech to fix my printer and he scanned my port to see if I was still on chat with him. After the block he asked if I was still there. He thought that we got disconnected :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outpost rocks, port scans blocked several times. Once was a chat session with a HP printer tech to fix my printer and he scanned my port to see if I was still on chat with him. After the block he asked if I was still there. He thought that we got disconnected <img src='http://www.securityteacher.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady D</title>
		<link>http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Hi. I remember years ago, a virus circulating was called &quot;little Red Riding Hood and the Big Bad Wolf.&quot; I recall that I sent the warning email to friends/family and co-workers..  Well needless to say....months later a distant cousin received the forewarned malicious email labeled as per my warning email content...she had not paid my warning attention and as a result required her entire computer rebuilt!!!  It is always difficult to decipher between what is a real threat and those that are perceived or just for someone else&#039;s fun and games. I do believe that all we can do is exercise with caution, take all the steps that we can in order to protect ourselves, and then hope for the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I remember years ago, a virus circulating was called &#8220;little Red Riding Hood and the Big Bad Wolf.&#8221; I recall that I sent the warning email to friends/family and co-workers..  Well needless to say&#8230;.months later a distant cousin received the forewarned malicious email labeled as per my warning email content&#8230;she had not paid my warning attention and as a result required her entire computer rebuilt!!!  It is always difficult to decipher between what is a real threat and those that are perceived or just for someone else&#8217;s fun and games. I do believe that all we can do is exercise with caution, take all the steps that we can in order to protect ourselves, and then hope for the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securityteacher.com/2008/04/10/beware-of-port-scanning/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>It is so frightning that these days even when we know we have kept everything up to date, a new threat might get through. We&#039;ve received letters from time to time warning of a new virus that will wipe everything, verified by Microsoft and Norton (for example) Pass it on... I don&#039;t pass it on I think this is a circular letter that will create a denial of service as I notice happens every time one of these gets out and everyone is sending on to everyone. Yet one day such a warning could be valid. But I think that such a virus will have already got us before it can be identified to warn about!
Erc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is so frightning that these days even when we know we have kept everything up to date, a new threat might get through. We&#8217;ve received letters from time to time warning of a new virus that will wipe everything, verified by Microsoft and Norton (for example) Pass it on&#8230; I don&#8217;t pass it on I think this is a circular letter that will create a denial of service as I notice happens every time one of these gets out and everyone is sending on to everyone. Yet one day such a warning could be valid. But I think that such a virus will have already got us before it can be identified to warn about!<br />
Erc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
